The Dutch pad round is not conditioning work
It looks like a fitness session and it is not one. The purpose is removing the decision point in the middle of a combination.
Long rounds, relentless pace, no rest between combinations. It is easy to conclude that the Dutch pad method is a conditioning exercise dressed up as skill work. It is the other way round.
The purpose is automaticity. A fighter who has to decide, mid-combination, whether the low kick is coming will either telegraph it or skip it. A fighter who has thrown the same chain ten thousand times throws the whole thing as a single action. That is the design goal, and every other feature of the method serves it: the length of the rounds, the refusal to let the fighter reset between elements, the corrections held back until the round ends.
The holder does half the work, and this is the part most gyms get wrong. A Dutch pad holder moves, counters after the combination, and punishes a dropped hand with a light shot to the head. That counter is the mechanism that keeps defence attached to offence — the fighter learns that the last punch of a chain must be followed by a return to guard, because something comes back every single time. Static pad holding produces fighters who admire their own combinations, and it is visible in the ring immediately.
What the method assumes is a ruleset with legal leg kicks and a clinch that gets broken. Copy it into a Muay Thai camp and you are training combinations that end at open range in a code where the clinch is where the round is won.